Part of the data ring
ReadLength
Two extents, one measure

Nicholas Nickleby vs The Journal of Sir Walter Scott

Both counted from their full texts, the same way, on the same day.

Nicholas Nickleby

322,429
words · 21h 30m
Longer
vs

The Journal of Sir Walter Scott

320,917
words · 21h 24m

1,512words between them — 6 min of it

Nicholas Nickleby is longer — 322,429 words against 320,917 for The Journal of Sir Walter Scott, a difference of 1,512 words or about 6 min of extra reading. Nicholas Nickleby is the harder read, at grade 10 against 6.9.

SOURCE·Project Gutenberg full texts·both editions counted the same way·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Side by side

Nicholas NicklebyThe Journal of Sir Walter Scott
AuthorDickens, CharlesScott, Walter
Words 322,429 320,917
Reading time at 250 wpm 21h 30m 21h 24m
Unique words 17,529 21,467
Sentences 13,950 21,807
Average sentence length 23.1 words 14.7 words
Reading grade 10 6.9
Reading ease 64.7 71.9
Long words 9.6% 9.9%

Highlighted cells are the larger figure — except reading ease, where higher means easier.

SOURCE·Project Gutenberg full texts·both editions, same counting rule·REVIEWED JUL 2026

How this is worked out

  1. Both texts are counted the same way, from the same source, with Gutenberg's header and licence footer struck first.
  2. The gap is stated in words and then in time at 250 words a minute — the rate is printed because a duration without one cannot be checked.
  3. Difficulty is compared on Flesch–Kincaid grade, which reads sentence and word length only. It cannot see irony or dialect, so treat it as a measure of surface, not of effort.
gap = |322,429 − 320,917| = 1,512 words
1,512 ÷ 250 wpm = 6 min of extra reading

Full methodology →

The second question

Which is longer, Nicholas Nickleby or The Journal of Sir Walter Scott?

Nicholas Nickleby is longer — 322,429 words against 320,917 for The Journal of Sir Walter Scott, a difference of 1,512 words or about 6 min of extra reading. Nicholas Nickleby is the harder read, at grade 10 against 6.9.

Colophon

Both figures computed from Project Gutenberg plain-text editions — ebook no. 967 and no. 14860 — and from no other source. Neither book’s text is set on this site.

SOURCE·Project Gutenberg full texts·US public domain·REVIEWED JUL 2026

Word counts and reading levels are computed from a specific public-domain edition and will differ from other editions and from other counting methods — see the method page.

See all 10 sites in this family, with what each one answers

Published by

Amit Sharma

Auckland real-estate agent and marketer. Builds free, sourced data tools.